Improving Students’ Ability In Writing Procedure Text Through Make A Match Larnng Mdl (PTK)

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Problem
Mastery of English teaching materials in junior high school include the four language skills, that are listening, speaking, reading and writing. All were supported by other languages elements, namely: Vocabulary, Grammar and Pronunciation. Of the four language skills above, writing is one of perceived language ability often become a problem for students in the process of English learning. It is very interesting to study the ability in writing, because it is influenced by the mastery of vocabulary, language structure and capabilities of students in stringing words into a good and acceptable sentence. Grammatical differences between English as a foreign language and Indonesian language as main language is an issue that often arises when learning to write. Ability to express meaning in rhetoric step in a simple short essays using a variety of written language accurately, fluently and acceptable to interact in the context of daily life in the form of procedure text is one of basic competencies (KD) that must be mastered by students Class VII Junior High School (SMP).
Learning to express the meaning  in rhetoric steps  in a short essay using a variety of simple written language accurately, fluently and acceptable to interact in the context of dailylife in the form of text procedure has been done in the classical writer. In the study the writers describe the subject matter contained in the following indicators:
- Arrange random sentences into a coherent text form of procedure.
The core activities of learning, students are typically given a sample of monologue in the form of a text procedure and the students are asked to find the meaning of the text which are then assembled into a proper sentence. The learning process as it is commonly practiced by the writer and student learning outcomes was not appropriate with the expectation and students are still get the minimum completeness criteria (KKM). The writer obtained the data from observations made through the reflection that students appear passive, bored and even some students who complain are not confident in expressing ideas. They are of course difficulties in doing the tasks assigned by the teacher. It bring assumptions that this learning methods are not successful (failed) and tend to be ineffective.
After observing the above description, we can see the reflection of the failure of the outcome and the learning process and it is a problem that must be solved immediately. In an effort to improve the failure, the writer try to find methods and appropriate learning strategies as the next solution. Writers are aware that in the era of this Education Unit Level Curriculum, teachers are required to be creative and innovative. Teachers must be able to find a learning technique appropriate to the class  situation and condition. The teacher is no longer a feared figure nor an writeritarian figure, but the teacher must be a facilitator and Elaborasior that facilitate and mobilize students to gain knowledge they need.
Here the writers try to use the approach Contextual Teaching And Learning and Cooperative Learning approach using a model of learning Make a Match.
The writer conducted research with the class action entitled, " Improving students’ ability in writing procedure text through make a match learning model in class VII.3 SMP N 27 Padang "
B. Formulation of the Problem
Based on the above background, the issues raised in this study is: "Whether through the Make a Match learning model can increase the ability of students in compose Procedure  text in Class VII.3 SMP N 27 Padang?"
C. Limitations of the Problem
Problems in the Classroom Action Research is limited on improving the quality of learning by using learning models Make a Match is expected to improve student learning outcomes in compose the English text of the form of procedure.
D. Purposes of the Research
Objectives to be achieved in this study are as follows:
1. Improve students' ability to compose the text procedure.
2. Develop learning strategies and learning models that are effective, efficient and enjoyable.
3. Students can involve themselves actively in communication with their ideas, opinions and feelings by writing simple.

E. Significance of the Research
1. As input for teachers in planning and developing learning strategies, especially through the implementation of Make a Match in learning process.
2. Contribute to the education world in an effort to improve the quality of education.
3. Fulfill a partial requirement to Complete Practice Teaching Program

CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
A. Text Procedure
Pocedure is one of the texts genre from several genres learned in junior high school. Procedure text aims to provide guidance on the steps / methods / ways of doing things (Otong Djuharie Setiawan, 2006). Text generally contains of procedure or a set of actions or steps in making a good or doing an activity. Text procedure, known also by the term directory.
Text procedure generally has the structure:
a. Goal, objective activity
b. Materials, ingredients needed to make a goods / perform an activity which is optional
c. Steps, a series of steps.
B. Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)
Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) is a holistic learning process and is aimed to help students to understand the meaning of teaching materials by linking it to the context of their everyday lives (personal context, social and cultural), so that students have the knowledge / dynamic and flexible skills to construct their own understanding actively. CTL is called contextual approach because the concept of learning that helps teachers to link between the material taught to students real-world situations and encourage students to make connections between its knowledge with its application in their lives as members of society. This is similar to Mulyasa (2003) students are curious and have the potential to satisfy his curiosity. Therefore the main task of teachers is create a fun learning environment condition in order to arouse the curiosity of all students so that they have interest to learn English. Mulyasa (2006) also suggest: the importance of learning environment in a contextual learning: (1) the effective learning starts from environment learning centered on students. (2) learning should be centered on how students use their new knowledge. Learning strategi is more importance than the outcome, (3) feedback is very important for students, (4) foster a learning community in the form of group work is important.
C. Cooperative Learning (CL)
Cooperative Learning is an approach that prioritizes teaching students to work together to understand each other and do all their learning tasks. Work in collaboration to develop high-level thinking, communication skills are essential, increase the interest, confidence, social awareness skills and tolerance towards individual differences. According to Anita Lie (1:10) There are three things to consider in cooperative learning,: Grouping, the spirit of teamwork, the classroom arrangement.
Learning groups, have a chance to express ideas, listen to the others opinions, and build a sense together, become very important in learning because it has a useful element to challenge the thinking and improving self esteem. With learning experiences the students can construct their own knowledge.
Lundgren describes the cooperative skills that need to be developed in a cooperative learning as interpersonal skills in learning. Cooperative skills include three levels, namely the basic, intermediate and advanced level, in every level there are some skills that need to be owned by students in order to properly implement cooperative learning. Skills include use agreements, value the contribution, taking turns and sharing the task, encouraging participation (basic level), active listening, showing respect and sympathy, ask, accept responsibility, and a summary (high level), to elaborate, check with carefully, ask for the truth and compromise (advanced level).
Writers agree that the cooperative approach is suitable for use in learning in the era of this curriculum, only seven pillars of this cooperative is considered too heavy to be implemented if all the learning in SMP Negeri 27 Padang. Therefore, the writers designed a learning technique that simplified without compromising the essence of cooperative itself. In this study, the writers use a model of learning Make A Match.
D. Learning Model Make a Match
In order to increase the participation and active student in the classroom, teachers apply learning models make a match. Methods make a match or find a partner is one alternative that can be applied to students. Application of this method starts from the technique that is students ask to find the pairs of cards that is the answer / question before the deadline, students are able to match the cards were given points.
Learning models make a match or find a partner developed by Lorna Curran (1994). One of the advantages of this technique is the students find a partner while learning about a concept or topic in a fun atmosphere. Steps of the method make a match as follows:
1. Teachers set up some cards that contain some of the concepts or topics that are suitable for review sessions, one part about the card and other parts of the answer card.
2. Each student gets a card that about questions / answers.
3. Each student think of an answer / question of the cards held.
4. Each student seeking a suitable partner with the card. Card holder that contain of a sentence of procedure A will pair up with the next sentence which is held by students in other groups that hold the sentence procedures B and so on.
5. Any student who can match his card before the deadline given points.
6. If students can not match the card with his card (can not find the card or cards about the answers) will get a penalty, which has been agreed.
7. After one round of cards, shuffled again so that each student gets a different card than before, and so on.
8. Students also can join with 2 or 3 other students who hold the appropriate card.
9. Teachers together with students make conclusions on the subject matter.

E. Action Plan
Action plan that can be used to address learning in order to attract writing, students become motivated with the cooperative learning method. With the optimization of learning English through the Co-operative technique is an alternative of learning process more enjoyable and meaningful. In this case the writers use a model of learning Make a Match.
Learning models make a match or find a partner developed by Lorna Curran (1994). One of the advantages of this technique is the students find a partner while learning about a concept or topic in a fun atmosphere. Steps of the method make a match as follows:
1. Teachers set up some cards that contain some of the concepts or topics that are suitable for review sessions, one part about the card and other parts of the answer card.
2. Each student gets a card that about questions / answers.
3. Each student think of an answer / question of the cards held.
4. Each student seeking a suitable partner with the card. Card holder that contain of a sentence of procedure A will pair up with the next sentence which is held by students in other groups that hold the sentence procedures B and so on.
5. Any student who can match his card before the deadline given points.
6. If students can not match the card with his card (can not find the card or cards about the answers) will get a penalty, which has been agreed.
7. After one round of cards, shuffled again so that each student gets a different card than before, and so on.
8. Students also can join with 2 or 3 other students who hold the appropriate card.
9. Teachers together with students make conclusions on the subject matter.

CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Setting Research
Classroom action research was conducted in SMP N 27 Padang. The schools in Sungai Paku street Air Paku,Padang city. Subjects of this research students of class VII.3 SMP N 27 Padang. The research is held on April 2012 or in second semester. The number of student in this class are 41 students, 19 male and 22 female students.
B. Preparation of Research
This class action research using contextual learning with a preparations:
a. Making pieces of research instruments
b. Prepare learning materials for the task of observation and discussion.
c. Prepare a model of learning and instructional media
d. Lesson Plan (RPP) to be attractive and easy to understand by students.
e. Prepare and determine the location of learning according to learning material.
f. Preparation of pre-test, post test and evaluation device fabrication.
g. Process assessment sheet for monitoring activity, autonomy, competence, fluency and accuracy.
h. Make an observation sheet for monitoring the activities of the learning process and to know the optimization of learning make a match.
C. Research Procedures
This Reasearch is a Class Action Research that is carried out by following the procedures of research based on the principle of Kemmis and Taggart (1988) which includes planning activities ,action, observation , reflection or evaluation . The fourth activity takes place repeatedly in the cycle.
Writer select learning materials writing procedure text with two cycle in second semester years of 20011-2012. Time allocation for the first cycle consisted of 2x40 minutes. On this learning, the writers performed three phase technique which include Exploration, Elaboration, and confirmation. These steps are carried out also in the second cycle onwards if necessary in this study.
On the explorations step, the teacher started learning by doing apperception and frequently asked the questions about students' experiences in everyday life that students often use a text procedure or steps to clarify or invite people to prepare or make something. Time spent in the Exploration step is limited 10 minutes.
In the elaboration step the teacher gives examples of texts procedure through the In Focus. Students are required to observe the procedure text steps on how to make coffee. Students are asked to write down key points as a step to make instant coffee. This step is restricted within 10 minutes.
The next step is a working group or confirmation. Students are asked to make a group. Each group of students consisted of 5 students. In this step the teacher share a card that contains the text of the topic sentence of a procedure to each student. The card is dealt to each group. Each group received 1 piece of card that will look for the sentence pair in the other groups. Students are required to reconstruct the sentence that is spread into the correct text. Students who are active and correct sentences in the preparation of a text will get the highest points. In this step students are limited to 20 minutes. The steps of the method make a match as follows:
1. Teachers set up some cards that contain some of the concepts or topics that are suitable for review sessions, one part about the card and other parts of the answer card.
2. Each student gets a card that about questions / answers.
3. Each student think of an answer / question of the cards held.
4. Each student seeking a suitable partner with the card. Card holder that contain of a sentence of procedure A will pair up with the next sentence which is held by students in other groups that hold the sentence procedures B and so on.
5. Any student who can match his card before the deadline given points.
6. If students can not match the card with his card (can not find the card or cards about the answers) will get a penalty, which has been agreed.
7. After one round of cards, shuffled again so that each student gets a different card than before, and so on.
8. Students also can join with 2 or 3 other students who hold the appropriate card.
9. Teachers together with students make conclusions on the subject matter.
At confirmation, students are given paper which is a copy of a booklet containing a random sentence (jumbled sentences) to be compiled into the correct procedure text. This step is limited to 15 minutes.
D. Cycle Research
In this research writers use two cycles as basic of class action research.
CYCLE 1
Planning stage ,includes:
1. Analyzing the syllabus / Education Unit Level Curriculum
2. Compose lesson plan with the CTL method with learning models make a match.
3. Designing a model of classical learning.
4. Discuss the application of interactive learning models.
5. Setting up the instruments (questionnaires, observation guides, the final test).
6. Arrange study groups of learners.
7. Planning a group task.
Stage of Action ,includes:
1. Implementing the steps in the planning
2. Applying the model of classical learning.
3. Make the observation of each of steps according to activities plan.
4. Set time allocation with many activities carried out.
5. Anticipating the obstacles with a solution when the action stage.
Observing stage , includes:
1. Observe the application of the classical learning model that teachers do in class VII
3. Record every activity and changes that occur when the application of classical learning models.
4. Discussions with teachers to discuss the weaknesses or deficiencies that teachers do and suggest improvements for the next study.
Reflection stage,includes:
1. Analyzing the findings when observation.
2. Analyze the weaknessess and strengthen of applying the classical learning model and consider next steps.
3. Reflect on the application of classical learning models.
4. Reflect on the creativity of learners in learning English.
5. Reflect on students learning outcomes.
CYCLE 2
Planning stage,includes:
1. Evaluate the results of reflection, discussion, and seek improvements to be implemented in the next study.
2. Assess the problems and constraints faced while learning.
3. Devise improvements based on reflection of a cycle I.
Stage of Action ,includes:
1. Conduct analysis of problem solving.
2. Corrective action by using the application of learning models Make a Match.
Observing stage ,includes:
1. Make observations on the application of learning models Make a Match.
2. Noting the changes.
3. Discuss the problems encountered when learning and provide feedback.
Phase Reflection ,includes:
1. Reflecting on learning make a match
2. Reflect the learning outcomes of students with the application of learning models make a match.
3. Analyze the findings and outcomes research.
4. make recommendations.
From the activity stage at cycle 1 and 2, the expected outcome is that (1) the students have the ability and creativity and are always actively involved in the process of learning English, (2) the teacher has the ability to design and implement an interactive learning model with a special working group on English subjects, and (3) an increase in student achievement in English subjects.
E. Analysis and Reflection
The analysis used in this study is quantitative descriptive analysis of the process and learning outcomes. The analysis is also done from the observation. The analysis is based on the cycle gradually. Analysis of the results in cycle 1 is reflected to cycle 2. Reflection is carried out in accordance with the planning done. Research with contextual learning methods, the researchers hope students will become more motivating in learning process. Follow-up in this study is that students can become more active and contextual learning will be conducted continually by the teacher.

CHAPTER IV
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A.    Action Report Cycle 1
a.                  Action
Implementation of action in a cycle I is the result of a meeting with the 2x40 minute time allocation. Implementation of the action in this cycle include planning, implementation actions (Exploration, elaboration and confirmation), observation and reflection of action.
On this learning, the writers performed a three-step learning techniques which include exploration, elaboration and confirmation. These steps are carried out also on second sikllus and so on if necessary in this study.
In the exploration step, the teacher started learning by doing apperception and frequently asked questions by students about students' experiences in everyday life that students often use a text procedure or steps to clarify or invite people to prepare or make something. Time spent in the Exploration step is limited 10 minutes
In the next step (elaboration), the teacher gives an example of procedure text through the media In Focus. Students are required to observe the procedure text steps on how to make coffee. Students are asked to write down key points as a step to make instant coffee. This move is restricted within 10 minutes.
The next step is a working group or elaboration. Students are asked make a group. Each group of students consisted of 5 students. In this step the teacher share a card that contains the text of the topic sentence of a procedure to each student. The card is dealt to each group. Each group received 1 piece of card that will look for the sentence pair in the other groups. Students are required to reconstruct the sentence that is spread into the correct text. Students who are active and correct sentences in the preparation of a text to get the highest points. In this step students are limited to 20 minutes.
On confirmation, students was given a working paper is a copy of a booklet containing a random sentence (jumbled sentences) to be compiled into the correct procedure text. This step is limited to 15 minutes.
b.                  Observations
At the core activities of the teacher to explain the structure of text preparation procedure by using the media in focus then the teacher asked the students to form groups and students are given a card that contains a random sentence. Students are asked to find a couple sentences in the other groups.
Based on the assessment process of seen that as many as 18 students (43%) students follow the learning process through active learning models make a match. The number of students who pasif is greater that as many as 23 students (56%).
1.                  Arrange random sentence into a text acceptable procedure
From the data obtained that no one students earning an "Excellent" and "very good" one (1) students (0.02%) scored "good", as many as four (4) students (0.10% ) scored "fair", twenty-eight (28) students (0.68%) scored "poor" and as many as eight (8) students (0.20%) obtained a value of "very poor".
c.                   The results of the Reflection Cycle-1
The definition of reflection is to remember and reflect on re an action exactly as it has been recorded in the observation.
From the observations can be found as many as 18 people (43%) of students who actively follow the lessons in line with expectations. While the majority of students, as many as 23 students (56%) were still visible in the learning process using the passive learning model make a match. Values obtained by the students were not shown significant results, even in identifying indicators of generic structure and language feature was not a single student who obtained an A (excellent). The majority of students, or as many as 25 students got an E (poor), one student get a B (Very Good), a student receives a grade C (Good), nine students received a D (fair). On the relevance of indicators compiled into a text sentence structure of individual students are still not generating the expected value. In fact none of the students that scored 'excellent' and 'very good'. The majority of students, or as many as 28 students got an E (poor).
Referring to the data and the results reflect the implementation cycle to one of the above can be concluded that learning to write up a sentence into the text form of the procedures performed in the first cycle can be said fail and have not been successful in improving students' skills in setting up random sentences into coherent text form of procedure . This is a problem and finding a solution should be sought immediately in an effort to improve the quality of learning quality.
B.     Action Report Cycle 2
a.      Action
Different from cycle I, in this cycle researchers use video in the stage of elaboration. Researchers present a video about the procedure how to use the ATM machine. This is done as an effort to clarify the matter so it is expected that students can easily capture the material displayed. In addition, the researchers also made a card to carry out the study make a match that contains as many as 10 random sentences of text divided into five parts, each part distribute to all students, amounting to 41 people.
In the exploration step, the teacher started learning by doing greeting and check students attendance. Teachers do the questions and answers about the matter to be discussed according to themes. Explanation of the syllabus and learning indicators are described in this stage. This is done so that students have limitation and objective in learning process. Exploration stage is restricted within 10 minutes. At this stage there are some students who can answer some questions posed by the teacher. This makes teachers feel comforted and motivated, the teacher can find out how much students have the basic ability of matter to be discussed in this meeting.
In elaboration step teachers use video media in transferring learning materials. Before the movie is playing, the teacher gives some notes on the blackboard in the form of keywords and what to do when students see the film. Furthermore students are given the opportunity to watch and see the film contains procedures for using ATM machines as well as the steps up procedure text. Students are asked to note the steps the procedure text and information that is implied from the films they see and observe. In this step, the students seemed enthusiastic and focused on the film being played. They were busy with her friends discuss what they see and they make some notes. At this step limited time 10 minutes.
The next step is a working group or elaboration. Students are required to join the group. Each group consisted of 5 and 6 students. The number of student groups as much as 8 groups of 41 students. Before handing out a card that contains random sentences, the teacher gives directions and rules of the game make a match in which students have to find pairs of cards that contains the sentence procedure in each group. Group that can finish the game quickly and correctly gets the highest points. Teacher's explanations are limited 5 minutes, then the teacher began distributing cards containing sentences of text topics procedure to each student. The card is distributed to the students as much as 41 cards. In this step students are limited to 20 minutes.
At confirmation, students are given paper which is a copy of a booklet containing a random sentence (jumbled sentences) to be compiled into the correct procedure text. This move is restricted within 20 minutes.
b.      Observations
In the observation phase, researchers conducted an assessment process in a way around to each group and observe the students' learning activities. Assessment process is focused on the assessment indicators include the students' attention to the matter, the cooperation of students in the group and students participation in doing their jobs.
Based on data obtained in cycle 2 there are some yield improvement in the learning process than the implementation of the action in cycle 1, even as many as 29 students active in the learning process and students are passive as many as 12 people
Students’ achievement increase is made possible by the fun of learning situations and not rigid. Students are happy and enjoy the video as a media and focus to follow the learning process. Through learning models make a match students were not given the opportunity to do other things outside of work groups with restrictions on time, so learning to work effectively.
1.                  Arrange random sentence into a text acceptable procedure
From the data obtained that none of the students who got an A 'excellent' and B 'very good'. A total of 3 students (0.07%) got a C-'good', 17 students (0.41%) gets the value of D 'fair', 20 students (0.49%) gets the value of E 'poor' and 1 student (0 , 02%) got an F 'very poor'.
c.       The results of Reflection
Final data results from data processing and analysis showed a significant increase that 29 of the 41 students (70.73%) were active in the learning process. The value of the evaluation test results of students wrote only one of his students (0.22%) are still not reaching KKM (minimal completeness criteria). These results can be concluded that learning to use the model make a match can solve the problem of students in formulating coherent sentences randomly into text form of procedure can make students actively in the learning process.
Thus the results of the implementation act of cycle 2 has experienced a significant increase, although researchers do not feel satisfied with the results that have been found. The increase in student learning outcomes can be seen in the table below.
Table 1. The Learning Process Improvement
Student Activity
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Percentage of students in the learning activity
43%
70.73%

Table 2. Improved Student Test Results
Student Activity
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Percentage of Students Achieving Value KKM (65)
0.22%
0.46%
Students who exceed the percentage of KKM (> 70)
0.27%
0.71%
The average value writing test results

62.72
70.12

Based on the discussion above explanation can be concluded that the purpose of research has been carried out to experience success. In other words, implimentasi action learning through learning models make a match can enhance students' skills in written text form procedure and increasing the activity of students in the learning process.


CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

A. Conclusion
Based on the results of data analysis and discussion it can be concluded as follows:
1. The ability of students in classes that were subjected to the type of learning make a match increase.
2. Students feel fun about learning method make a match.

B. suggestion
Based on these conclusions, the writers suggest a few things as follows:
1. With the presence of significant effects of application of the Make a Match in learning to develop students' skills in the procedure text text, then the type of active learning with Make a Match can be used as an alternative for teachers in an effort to increase the activity, motivate, creativity and abilities of students in English lessons.
2. This study was limited to identifying the linguistic characteristics of procedure text only, and is expected to have more research about the other linguistic characteristics texts as well as other subjects.

G+

Jika Anda menyukai Artikel di blog ini, Silahkan klik disini untuk berlangganan gratis via email, dengan begitu Anda akan mendapat kiriman artikel setiap ada artikel yang terbit di ENGLISH ASSISTANT

Related Posts: